Category Archives: 2009 Contract Negotiations

Update on latest round of contract negotiations

The Indianapolis News Guild’s bargaining committee concluded our latest set of meetings Wednesday afternoon with representatives of Gannett regarding our attempts to come to an agreement on a new contract.

We have been making progress on issues such as overtime and expense reimbursement (related to travel compensation for use of a personal vehicle versus a company car), but we aren’t moving fast enough for the company’s liking. Given the state of the economy, and the company’s initial rejection of almost all of our proposals, the Guild today proposed that we would agree to a wage freeze for one year if the company would agree to extend the current contract for one year – a gamble that perhaps the financial climate would improve by 2010.

Gannett legal counsel Bill Behan declined our offer and, on the record, said the reason is that the Guild did not agree to other proposals that Gannett considers a priority. He also said it’s very possible that Gannett corporate may require him to prepare a new proposal that includes a wage cut, although no time frame was given.

The Guild’s package offer would have eliminated several of Gannett’s more onerous proposals, including doing away with seniority provisions related to layoffs and a “same as” clause that essentially gives the company the right to implement any measures it deems necessary to reduce business expenses, leaving the Guild no right to grievance or arbitration over such measures.

We meet again March 11 & 12 at the bargaining table.

— officers, stewards and members of the Guild contract team

1 Comment

Filed under 2009 Contract Negotiations

Update on contract negotiations

Tuesday afternoon, your Indianapolis Newspaper Guild contract bargaining team completed two days of talks with management representatives from The Star and Gannett.  Although we tentatively reached agreement on three minor matters, we are still left with significant differences between our proposal and Gannett’s 12-page offer.

On Monday, Bill Behan, the lawyer bargaining for Gannett and The Star,  told us he was uninterested in any of our contract proposals, which included parts of Gannett’s own ethics policy regarding differentiating news and advertising.  Tuesday, our bargaining team indicated the Guild is uninterested in several of the company’s proposals, which would weaken the working conditions in the newsroom and building services.

We are steadfastly against the company’s proposed changes to our contract that would allow Guild-represented employees to be assigned advertorial work; would make the publisher the sole determiner of which employees are let go in any future layoffs, eliminating the Guild’s right to grievance or arbitration; would keep wages stagnant; would allow the outsourcing of work currently done by Guild-represented employees; would allow the manipulating of the 40-hour work week with split shifts and split days off; and would curtail the payment of  overtime for some employees.

Our Guild, by recently voting to agree to a week of furloughs, has shown that it is reasonable and willing to be flexible to help the bottom line of the Indianapolis Star. But several of the contract proposals by the company go too far. All of the 200-plus members of our bargaining unit need to be concerned and to stay informed.

Although it is still early in the process, the negotiator for the company told the bargaining committee that the Guild better be willing to negotiate a new contract quickly, saying the company’s proposals could get even worse if he receives “new marching orders” as Gannett struggles during the economic downturn.

We return to the bargaining table Feb. 24.25.

— The officers and stewards of Indianapolis News Guild Local No. 34070

1 Comment

Filed under 2009 Contract Negotiations

Recap, 1st negotiations with Star

Members of the Indianapolis Newspaper Guild Local 34070 — your union reps — met with three members of management Thursday, Jan. 8, to begin bargaining what would be our third contract in Gannett’s 9-year ownership of the Star. Our side submitted an initial proposal, and the company followed suit. We adjourned immediately after, and both sides have much to digest until our next sessions slated for Feb. 9-10.

The company’s 12-page offer sheet contains some surprising requests — not that unusual, frankly; these are just starting points, and we’ll wager they are as bothered with some of the elements of our proposal as we are with theirs.

As a Guild member, however, you should be aware of the plans of management, which include:

  • The Guild wants the Star to adopt Gannett’s ethics policy into our contract to ensure the wall between advertising and editorial is never breached; Gannett, however, proposes that managers would have the right to assign journalists to news and info projects of any type that would include (besides print, online, TV and radio) custom publications, which is a code word for advertorial.
  • The Guild proposes reasonable, across-the-board pay raises of 4% to replace the unreliable merit pool system of the past and to give employees a reliable wage hike in place of confusing formulas the company currently uses; Gannett proposes that only managers get to grant raises, and only as they see fit.
  • The Guild proposed to keep the wage structure we have, and to raise all contract rates to reflect inflation since 2005. The company proposed to do away with contract minimums other than first-year minimums, and did not adjust them for inflation since 2005. The company proposal for pay for building services employees is at $7.02 per hour, a figure that will be below the federal minimum wage when it goes up to $7.25 per hour on July 24, 2009.
  • The Guild would allow the company to do layoffs but only because of demonstrated economic need and only after seniority is given No.1 consideration; Gannett wants the publisher to be the sole judge in determining layoffs, and that layoffs can occur at the publisher’s whim, including when he or she deems that worker’s job to be “expendable” — with no right to file a grievance or get a judge to look at it in arbitration.
  • The Guild made absolutely no changes to the list of people who are exempt from the contract, which normally includes high-ranking, management-level editors; Gannett wants to make exempt some pro sports beat writers, editorial writers, and columnists from all sections of the newspaper — with no hope for overtime or any other contract protections.

Gannett wants the right to outsource some types of jobs (it didn’t say which) and the ability to make across-the-board wage reductions. It wants to exempt some reporters and columnists from being able to collect OT. It wants the right to control your 40-hour work week by splitting your shifts and even your off days — if beat coverage so dictates — at their discretion, not by mutual consent. It wants the right to make demotions as it sees fit and reduce a person’s salary in the process. Whereas the contract currently calls for an employee to receive 1-1/2 times OT pay if called in after their shift, under Gannett’s proposal, now they would just receive straight time — no bonus.

In sum, some pretty scary provisions are being presented to us, in one of the worst times for our industry. Unfortunately, regardless of how well Indianapolis is performing as a business, we’re going to be viewed in the context of how Gannett as a whole is operating. Because of that prospect, we’re going to need the support of our 200+ member Guild like never before to make our voice loud and clear, and we’re going to need to hear from you.

The bargaining committee will meet this Saturday, 2 to 5 p.m., at the musicians hall across from the parking garage. The next membership meeting, meanwhile, is noon Thursday, Jan. 22, also at the musicians hall. It also is a special election to pick a president, treasurer and vice president for a term that runs through July 2010. Duespayers can come and vote. Non-duespayers, come over and we’ll sign you up. Either way, bend our ear, via an e-mail at indynewsguild70@gmail.com. We promise to act in your best interests and to keep you posted throughout this process. And keep in mind that we are still operating under the protections of the “expired” 2005 contract thanks to the evergreen clause.

In solidarity,

Officers and stewards of the Indy News Guild
www.indynewsguild.com

Leave a comment

Filed under 2009 Contract Negotiations

Contract talks begin Thursday, Jan. 8

At 9:30 a.m. Thursday, Jan. 8, the Indy News Guild Local 30470 returns to the bargaining table with representatives from Gannett. We’ll learn what corporate has in store for over 200 union members (newsroom and building services) in 2009 and beyond as we try for a third contract.

It’s not going to be an easy process, but we promise to do our best and to stay in touch with you via email, Inklings, and our new Web site — indynewsguild.com, which has been revamped and will be frequently updated. We’ll seek your feedback.

Meantime, if you see an officer, steward or contract committee volunteer, give them a pat on the back. We negotiate on our own time, so the long hours that will be spent in coming weeks require we take personal leave or longer shifts to make up for those lost hours. (Or that we come in on our off-hours). But we all agree, it’s definitely worth it.

In solidarity,
Interim President Tom Spalding and the officers and stewards of Indy News Guild 34070

Leave a comment

Filed under 2009 Contract Negotiations

Contract negotiations begin Jan. 8

The Guild and management are scheduled to begin bargaining on a new contract on Jan. 8. The Guild’s bargaining team has met four times in preparation for negotiations. Our current contract expired Dec. 31. However, the contract remains in effect. It contains an “evergreen clause” that states: “The terms and conditions of this agreement shall remain in effect during such negotiations.” If you have ideas or concerns you want addressed in our next contract, contact a Guild officer or steward.

Leave a comment

Filed under 2009 Contract Negotiations