2nd-quarter furlough status report

Your Guild leadership team wanted to keep you in the loop regarding the company’s plans to implement second-quarter furloughs, a move that will impact the 200+ people in our bargaining unit.

The Guild has agreed to schedule a vote. We are currently in the process of negotiating the specific date. In a meeting on the sixth floor on Wednesday we proposed April 1, since we are legally obligated to give our parent organization, CWA/TNG, enough time (5 days) to ensure this contractual change (a pay cut) is in our best interests. The company has countered, saying it wants an answer from membership by March 30 or (and this is a direct quote from Human Resources to us, “we will proceed with layoff planning in order to achieve the full savings in the second quarter.”)

The Guild is not trying to stymie any of the company’s plans, and in fact, we have advised Dennis Ryerson that it would be a good idea for employees to start tentatively requesting their furlough days, so that supervisors can pencil in the schedules and get them implemented if the union members vote “yes.” But by threatening layoffs unless the company’s deadline was met, it effectively cut off any reasonable negotiation period … so today (Thursday) we asked the company again if they are serious about proceeding with layoffs — even if the outcome of the membership vote ends up being in favor of the second-quarter furloughs?

Additionally, here’s what the company has told us in response to costs and raises:

  1. Their goal is to achieve 1.92% of straight-time payroll in our unit as a result of the furloughs. (We have asked for a specific dollar amount of savings).
  2. The number of layoffs, in lieu of furlough participation, that will be required to achieve the 1.92% in savings is undetermined. This will depend on the compensation rates of the individuals selected the layoff. (We asked for specific scenarios and hard numbers).
  3. Only one of our covered employees will receive a two-week furlough. All other bargaining unit members will receive a one-week furlough.
  4. The company will continue to provide merit pay increases, per contract, in addition to step increases until a contract change is negotiated. (As you know, we’re in the midst of working out a new deal, with talks set to resume April 14-15.)
  5. If the Guild agrees to the furlough, the company is not interested in excluding any members of our bargaining unit from participation. (We asked that employees who make $12-per hour and under be excluded from the furlough due to their particular economic situation).

The vote we’ll put before membership, as it stands now, would likely be a simple 1) YES to furlough or 2) NO to furlough. We’re still trying to figure out times and location for early next week, so keep your calendar open!

Please keep in mind that union officers, in general, support more furloughs instead of layoffs or permanent wage cuts. But we have a responsibility to make sure our members’ rights are respected and that you have enough information to make an informed vote — not a rushed vote.

E-mail us with any questions and, as always, stay informed at indynewsguild.com

Leave a comment

Filed under Layoffs/Buyouts

2nd round of furloughs

Just like last time, the changes outlined in the letter today from Gannett regarding Furlough No. 2 are all things that the company would have to negotiate with the Guild as exceptions to the contract. Just like last time, the union leadership won’t act until we’ve called together the membership for discussion and a vote, plus examined our options. Just like last time, their proposal would result in a roughly 2% pay cut (depending on income). Unlike last time, if the Guild is going to agree to anything that results in a cut in income, then Guild members in Indianapolis deserve to see some major sacrifice at the corporate level, beyond what they’ve advertised today, as well as a chance to look at the books.

I likely won’t be able to have a conversation with Star management about furlough No. 2 until Tuesday at the earliest, when I return from (ironically) finishing furlough No. 1, which is today. Hang in there, everybody. We’ll continue to get, and relay to you, details and direction. I can tell you that, out of fairness, I’ll be recommending to our board that we won’t collect/deduct dues for one upcoming paycheck.

For the Guild
Tom Spalding, president
Indianapolis News Guild

Leave a comment

Filed under Layoffs/Buyouts

Gannett puts 15% pay cut on the table

The Indianapolis News Guild is sad to inform you that Gannett is now seeking to cut the pay of newsroom and building services employees by 15 percent. The lawyer for the company provided us with a one-page “supplemental” proposal this afternoon that he said would implement this uniform salary reduction either 1) at the time we reach a new contract with the company, or 2) at the time both sides reach an impasse and cease talks.

This was a disappointing move, given that we thought the company’s bargaining team was starting to embrace the concept of negotiating instead of dictating. In fact, we believe the company’s actions at the table today raise the specter of regressive and bad-faith bargaining.

Company lawyer Bill Behan said Gannett expects to save $1.5 million annually by cutting salaries across the board within the union. He said the Indianapolis Star is “viable” and to continue to make it viable, the company must cut its expenses in light of the economic slowdown that is hurting ad revenue.

The Guild did not respond to the proposal immediately; we asked for financial information so we can confirm whether the company’s finances are as dire as claimed. Behan declined to disclose those numbers. He also declined to say whether this 15 percent proposal is aimed exclusively at the 200+ members of our bargaining unit (newsroom and building services) or would also apply to other employees at the Star, including management. And, although we have no direct control over health care costs, we have asked if the company will be adjusting/reducing premiums, as there are four “tiers” that are tied to your annual salary.

Despite this setback, the Indy News Guild believes it is far from an impasse. We were progressing on the matter of layoff language – i.e. how the company uses seniority when it determines who to lay off in such a scenario. The Guild believes it has plenty to talk about at the bargaining table and will continue to try to negotiate a fair contract with the company.

Nothing is going to happen immediately. We return to the bargaining table in mid-April, and we’ll again be calling a membership meeting soon to discuss strategy and our options. As always, stay tuned to this Web site for background and shoot us an email at indynewsguild70@gmail.com.

5 Comments

Filed under 2009 Contract Negotiations

Negotiate, Don’t Dictate signs available for free

Negotiate, Don't DictateYour Indianapolis News Guild 34070 is still in the early stages of negotiations with Gannett over a new contract, and we want talks to stay productive and not one-sided! You can do your part. Ask a Guild officer for one of our “desk tents” — bright red signs that fold into a simple message, a message that needs to be spread around the Indianapolis Star: “NEGOTIATE, Don’t Dictate.” We unveiled them March 8 at a membership meeting of the Guild, and they are now free and available to anyone who wants one.

The Guild contract team returns to the bargaining table this Wednesday and Thursday.

Get up to date and stayed informed at indynewsguild.com

— the officers, stewards and contract team Indy News Guild 34070

Leave a comment

Filed under 2009 Contract Negotiations

Guild membership meeting Sunday, March 8

To all members:

The Guild is holding a membership meeting at 2 p.m. Sunday, March 8, at the Musicians Hall. We urge all members to attend. The purpose of the meeting is to bring you up to date on the current contract negotiations and to get your feedback and direction on future negotiations. At the meeting we will:

1. Explain the company’s current contract proposals and how they will affect you and your working conditions.

2. Seek direction from the membership on how you want the Guild negotiating committee to deal with the company’s three worst proposals. They are:

  • a pay freeze — and the company has threatened to seek a pay cut if the Guild does not agree to a new contract quickly;
  • the elimination of seniority as a consideration in future layoffs;
  • and a “same as” provision. This “same as” provision would allow the company to impose any working conditions it deems necessary to reduce business expenses on Guild employees as long as it imposes the same working conditions on non-union employees. This proposal also seeks to take away the Guild’s right to file grievances or seek arbitration on these changes.

3. Discuss what the members are willing to do to support the Guild as it tries to negotiate these proposals.

Gannett’s labor team is pushing our bargaining committee to agree quickly to the three proposals outlined above. The company has threatened that its proposals will get worse if we do not agree to what they have offered. We consider their tactics not a negotiation, but a dictation.

The Indianapolis Star is changing, all in the name of economic survival. The impact has been felt in a variety of ways — smaller newspapers, layoffs, furloughs, and even an ad in the skybox of A1 starting with Sunday’s paper. The Guild’s members already have shown they are willing to make concessions to help the company during the difficult economic times by approving the furloughs in the first quarter of this year. Now we must fight to preserve as much of our contract as we can.

We need to hear your voice before we meet again to negotiate with the company’s representatives on March 11 and 12. Please attend the Guild membership meeting at the Musicians Hall 2 p.m. Sunday, March 8. This is an opportunity for you to help shape our next contract.

The Guild contract negotiating committee

Leave a comment

Filed under 2009 Contract Negotiations, Events/Meetings